Why a general AI can read your policy but can't win your claim, what we do differently, and exactly where a human picks up. No black boxes.
Steve has spent more than 40 years in insurance law, on both sides: first inside the industry, then for consumers. For over a decade as a litigator for policyholders, he fought refused claims for as many people as he could, and he won for them. But for every person he helped, he had to turn others away with exactly the same problem. What bothered him most was that people with smaller claims couldn't afford him: paying £300 an hour for proper legal representation made no sense for the amount at stake.
It was never about the lost fees. It was the lost chance to even the odds. Insurers write policies in language most people were never meant to follow, then refuse claims with reasoning that doesn't stand up.
AI has finally made it possible to put Steve's know-how to work for everyone, at once. We made it safe to use and accurate enough to trust by grounding it in his proven playbooks and our own proprietary know-how, not in whatever a chatbot happens to guess.
“I could help one person at a time. Now the same playbook helps everyone.”Steve Smart
Today's AI is very good at reading a long policy and a refusal letter and spotting what matters. But in every test we ran, with every leading AI model, spotting the problem wasn't enough. The letters they wrote sounded convincing, yet they weren't the kind an insurer that has already said no would back down to.
| What it takes | A general AI chatbot | smarterclaims |
|---|---|---|
| Reads your policy and refusal letter | Yes, quickly | Yes, every page |
| Knows every reason an insurer could reject a claim like yours | Guesses from general knowledge | Checks your case against every one in Steve's playbook |
| Has an answer for each rejection | Writes a general argument that sounds right | Uses Steve's rebuttal for that exact rejection |
| Backs it up with the law | Can cite the wrong case, or one that doesn't exist | Only UK law, case law and Ombudsman decisions that fit your case |
| Proven against real insurers | Never tested | £25M+ won for policyholders in refused claims |
You can try fighting your claim with any of the top AI chatbots. But can you tell if its letter is legally right, or if it just sounds right?
Your insurer's claims team can. They handle refused claims every day, and a letter that only sounds right is easy to turn down a second time.
Behind the scenes, several different AI models and AI agents work together, each with one job. They're orchestrated and kept on track by detailed legal instructions, and grounded in multiple playbooks written by a real person: Steve, from more than 40 years in insurance law, on both the insurer's and the consumer's side.
Your policy and refusal letter, page by page: every clause, exclusion and date, and the exact reason your insurer gave.
Steve's playbook lists every reason an insurer could use to turn down a claim under a policy like yours. The AI checks your case against each one.
Each rejection it finds is paired with Steve's counter-arguments, written for exactly that rejection.
The argument that fits your policy wording and your insurer's reasoning, with links to the UK law, case law and Ombudsman decisions that apply to your case, and nothing else.
The AI never decides what to argue. The arguments come from Steve's playbooks, proven in real disputes with insurers.
It gives you legal information and a letter you can choose to send. That's a different thing, and the difference matters. smarterclaims is an information service, like a published legal guide made digital, not a solicitor advising you on your case.
You're not its client. Nothing is sent on your behalf. The letter goes out in your name, from you, when you decide to send it.
It's a digital self-help tool, powered by AI, built on our expert content. If your case is high-value or hard-contested, you're more likely to need professional representation. If it looks like one of these, the tool tells you, and we can introduce you to the right people.
The legal thinking is human. Steve Smart documented the refusal patterns, the arguments and the citations, and he reviews and updates them as the laws, regulations and Ombudsman decisions change. The AI applies his playbook. It doesn't invent the law.
You see the AI's read of your case (the refusal it found, the arguments it picked) before any money changes hands. If it's misread something, you can tell it.
The final letter is yours. You send it to your insurer in your own name. If they don't budge, we tell you what to do next, including how to take it to the Financial Ombudsman Service, which is free to use.
Your refusal letter and policy documents are held only for as long as it takes to run the analysis and write your letter. Then they're deleted.
We don't sell your data. We don't share it with insurers. We don't use it to train external models.
smarterclaims publishes legal know-how in a structured, AI-powered format and writes letters you can send yourself. We are not a law firm and not a claims management company. We are not regulated by the SRA or the FCA. If your case needs representation, we'll tell you straight.
The AI isn't in charge. It just delivers the know-how, reliably and affordably.
We tell you when AI is involved, what it's doing, and where the human picks up. No black boxes. No "powered by AI" theatre.
No-questions-asked money-back guarantee
See a sample packDrop in your refusal letter and see where you stand. Free to check.
Drop your refusal letter → £49.99 · No account · Minimal questions · Money-back guarantee